Showing posts with label SubContinentFocus: India. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SubContinentFocus: India. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

'More poor' in India than Africa

Eight Indian states account for more poor people than in the 26 poorest African countries combined, a new measure of global poverty has found.
The Indian states, including Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal, have 421 million "poor" people, the study found.

This is more than the 410 million poor in the poorest African countries, it said.

The Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) measures a range of "deprivations" at household levels.

Developed by Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI) with UN support, it will feature in the upcoming UNDP Human Development Report.

The measure assess a number of "deprivations" in households - from education to health to assets and services.
"The MPI is like a high resolution lens which reveals a vivid spectrum of challenges facing the poorest households," said OPHI director Dr Sabina Alkire.

'More poor' in India than Africa

Sunday, June 13, 2010

Rajiv Gandhi assassin Nalini alleges harassment by jail authorities

Rajiv Gandhi assassin Nalini alleges harassment by jail authorities

Rajiv Gandhi's assassin, Nalini Sriharan, who is serving a life term in Tamil Nadu's Vellore Central Prison, has alleged that the jail authorities are harassing her.


In a letter written to State Inspector General of Prisons, Nalini alleged that the jail authorities are treating her like a contagious disease patient.

Addressing media, Nalini's counsel P Pugalenthi also alleged that the jail authorities are violating prison manual rules.
Pugalenthi complained that Nalini is also being prevented from communicating with the outside world.

In her letter, Nalini said the jail authorities are preventing other prisoners from interacting with her.

All the prisoners have been prevented from moving around near my cell. Neither the prison staff nor the prisoners are allowed to talk to me. I am being treated like a person with contagious disease, Nalini stated.

Nalini also requested the Inspector General of Prisons to shift her to the Puzhal Jail.

Pugalenthi said the jail authorities forcibly prevented her from giving him copies of her complaint. The notice warned that prison administration was contemplating action against Nalini.

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Population, incomes tilt India towards food imports

Population, incomes tilt India towards food imports


India's anxiety over erratic monsoon rains will become more acute as rising incomes and a growing population push up demand for farmed produce faster than supply, turning the nation into a major importer within 5 years.


Forecasts of a normal monsoon this year have stirred hopes for smooth supplies and low inflation, reversing setbacks from last year's poor rains. But the country must boost yields if it is to feed nearly its 1.2 billion people -- a fifth of the world's population -- on just 4 percent of global land.

India is already the world's top importer of edible oils and ranks among the biggest producers and consumers of wheat, rice, cotton and sugar, making it a key driver of global prices if the failure of a monsoon forces it to import grains or sugar.

But even if monsoon rains are plentiful, India is likely to become a large food buyer within a few years.

"There is a food shortage," said T.K. Bhaumik, an economist with JK Corp. "That is really at the root of high grain prices. India will be a major food importer in 4-5 years' time."

M.S. Swaminathan, a scientist who helped kick off the 1960s-era Green Revolution that boosted India's grain yields, said early successes had made policy makers complacent about farms and irrigation.

"There is an emerging crisis," he said. "We have a tremendous problem on the food front, both on the production side and consumption side."

The growing hunger for commodities has lured trading firms such as Noble, Louis Dreyfus, Cargill and Czarnikow to India, while NYSE Euronext, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity International have bought up stakes in Indian commodities exchanges.

"India is going to be a major player in the global supply and demand balance," said Diego Parrilla, head of commodities for Asia-Pacific at Bank of America-Merrill Lynch.

A graphic on India's farm yield gap:


A graphic on India's projected growth in demand and supply of farm products:


FOOD PRICES SOARING

India's food prices have risen an annual 15 percent or more for several months, sparking wide protests and spurring the government to free farm commodities from import duties, but the country's colossal demand rattles markets, making imports a costly, inflationary option.

An Indian sugar deficit last year helped hoist New York raw sugar futures to a 29-year peak, while a tender to import 2 million tonnes of rice helped Chicago Board of Trade rice rise to a contract high last November, though it was later cancelled.

"As India is one of the largest consumers of quite a few basic foods, even small purchases by India tend to affect global prices," said Devika Mehndiratta, an analyst at Credit Suisse in Singapore.

Growth in India's grain output has fallen back in recent years, slowing steadily from a spectacular jump of 50 percent in the 10 years after the green revolution, and a rise of 30 to 40 percent in the two decades that followed.

Analysts say food prices were rising even before the monsoon failed last year, and inflation soared past the level struck after a drought in 2002, when the summer-sown crop shrank 41 percent, a steeper fall than the 2009 drop of 9.3 percent.

"We think that the recent food price spurt reflects more than just one-off supply disruptions. The last, somewhat worse, drought in 2002 did not see such sharp price rises," Mehndiratta said.

As the economy expands, India's poorest 410 million citizen, who earn less than $1.25 a day, will buy more grains, edible oil and sugar, aided by a job-guarantee scheme that has boosted household incomes by nearly half over 2 years, some studies show.

"An increase in income has resulted in an increase in ability of rural households to purchase food grains, other essential commodities, and to access education and health care," the junior minister for rural development, Pradeep Jain, told parliament.

DEMAND OUTSTRIPS SUPPLY

Demand for many farm commodities will quickly outpace supply, Surabhi Mittal, a senior fellow at the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations told the federal Planning Commission in a paper.

In 10 years' time, India's edible oils deficit will be 17.7 million tonnes, or double its 2009 imports, and its sugar shortfall will be nearly 40 million, or five times the deficit that triggered last year's global rally, Mittal estimated.

Within 15 years, India's rapidly growing population is expected to surpass China's, which will peak at 1.4 billion, the U.S. census bureau estimates.

Although India's planned expenditure on water resources rose to 2,323.11 billion rupees, or $50 billion in the five years to March 2012, two and a half times the allocated $20.5 billion in the previous five years, irrigation continues to be a challenge.

With virtually no scope to expand area under cultivation, some of which is being encroached by highways and urban expansion, India can raise output only by lifting its yields, which are half to a third of Western levels.

But raising yields is difficult as small farmers, who own 80 percent of the land, do not use modern practices, while output by big farmers in grain-bowl states such as Punjab has saturated.

"We are already using water, fertilisers and chemicals in excess to keep the production up, which has put tremendous pressure on our resources," said P.S. Rangi, marketing consultant at the Punjab State Farmers' commission.

To meet the challenge, government agencies offer attractive payments to encourage planting of wheat and rice instead of other crops while growers of oilseeds and cane face market volatility.

Last year, a switch from cane to wheat forced India to import sugar but now higher prices have lured farmers back, deflating prices as Indian imports dry up and supply from Brazil rises.

"In the longer term, this highlights the fact that production swings in the two largest players, India and Brazil, are now becoming too large compared to the size of overall sugar trade flows," Sucden said in a recent report.

That makes makes India a good hunting ground for traders.

"There is no question that if you want to know what's going on in the commodities market, you will have to have a foot in what's going on in India," Parrilla said.

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

India gold trades near record high; traders at bay

India gold trades near record high; traders at bay

India gold traded near its record high on Wednesday afternoon tracking strong overseas leads, and traders were unwilling to get stuck with high-priced stocks ahead of a key gold buying festival, dealers said.


"The feedback from customers is that they would wait rather than buy at current near-record levels," said a dealer with a private bullion importing bank.

International gold, which guides the domestic market, was trading at $1,228.55/1,299.55 an ounce as against the previous close of $1,232.05/1,233.05, after hitting an all-time high of $1,233.65 in the last session.

"Nobody had expected such a sudden jump in prices, they are all waiting for below $1,200 (an ounce) levels," said another dealer with a state-run bank.

The most-traded gold futures on the Multi Commodity Exchange was trading 1.06 percent higher at 18,086 rupees per 10 grams, after hitting a high of 18,222 rupees, nearing its all-time high of 18,294 rupees, struck on Dec. 3.
The Akshaya Tritiya festival, which falls on May 16, is one of the two most auspicious days of the year to buy the yellow metal in the world's largest gold market, as Hindus believe they can get lasting prosperity by buying precious metals on the day. The other festival is Dhanteras in November.

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

S.M. Krishna says to visit Pakistan on July 15

S.M. Krishna says to visit Pakistan on July 15


Foreign Minister S.M. Krishna said on Tuesday he had accepted an invitation from his Pakistani counterpart to visit Islamabad for talks on July 15, a further sign of improving ties between the rival countries.


"I'm looking forward to these talks," Krishna told a news conference in New Delhi after speaking with his Pakistani counterpart Shah Mehmood Qureshi by telephone on Tuesday.

Last month, the prime ministers of nuclear-armed India and Pakistan held talks in Bhutan and asked their officials to take steps as soon as possible to normalise relations.

"It was a good conversation that we had," Qureshi told reporters, according to comments broadcast on Indian television channels.

"I'm presuming that both sides are comfortable with the structure in place (for improving relations)," he said.

Relations between the the two countries went into a diplomatic freeze after India blamed Pakistan-based militants for the Mumbai attacks in November 2008.

Monday, May 3, 2010

Court finds Mumbai attack accused Kasab guilty

Court finds Mumbai attack accused Kasab guilty

A court on Monday found Pakistani citizen Mohammad Ajmal Kasab guilty of involvement in the 2008 Mumbai attacks, the first verdict delivered in a case that has worsened ties between New Delhi and Islamabad.


The court found Kasab, the lone surviving gunman from the Mumbai attacks, guilty of charges including waging war on India and murder. Sentencing will be on Tuesday and he could now face the gallows.

Kasab was caught on tape strolling through Mumbai's main train station carrying an AK-47 rifle and a knapsack on his back, prosecutors say. Nearly 60 people were gunned down in the crowded station.

Kasab, wounded by police and arrested on the first night of the attacks, initially admitted his role and then said he had been framed.

At least 166 people, including foreigners and some of India's wealthy business elite, were killed by 10 Pakistani gunmen in a three-day rampage through some of Mumbai's best known landmarks including two luxury hotels and a Jewish centre.

Two Indian nationals accused of being members of the Pakistani militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and of conducting reconnaissance in Mumbai before the attack, were aquitted of all charges, according to the court.

The Mumbai attack prompted New Delhi to break off peace talks with Pakistan, saying Islamabad must first act against militants operating from its soil, including the LeT, of which Kasab is accused of being a member.

India had charged 38 people in connection with the attack, most of them living in Pakistan.

The verdict comes days after the prime ministers of India and Pakistan held talks in Bhutan and asked their officials to take steps to normalise relations, signalling a thaw in ties that analysts say should not be affected by Monday's verdict.


One risk to normalising relations is another major militant attack in India and the ensuing political pressure that could force the government to break off the dialogue process.

Saturday, May 1, 2010

U.S., Australia warn of terror attacks in India

U.S., Australia warn of terror attacks in India

The United States and Australia on Saturday warned of "imminent" terror attacks on a number of popular shopping centres in New Delhi, stepping up their previous alerts of last month.


The U.S. advisory issued on Wednesday spoke of "increased indications that terrorists are planning imminent attacks" in some of New Delhi's crowded markets frequented by foreigners.

Some of these markets have been attacked in the past.

Australia asked its citizens to be vigilant.

"Specific and credible information indicates that terrorist attacks in New Delhi, especially in markets, may be imminent," said the advisory from the Australian High Commission.

Indian police officials say they take these warnings seriously, especially as the city is hosting the Commonwealth Games in October.

Threats to sporting events were underscored last month when bombs exploded outside a packed cricket stadium in south India.

India raised security in the aftermath of a bombing that killed 17 people in western India in February, the first major attack in the country since the 2008 Mumbai attacks that killed 166 people.

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

India Blocks the Progress of SAARC

India Blocks the Progress of SAARC

The 16th Summit of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) will take place in Thimpu, Bhutan on April 28-29, this year. The SAARC was established when its Charter was adopted on December 8, 1985 and now has Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka as member nations.


It is also being speculated that Pakistan’s Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani and his Indian counterpart Manmohan Singh may take this opportunity to meet on the side to talk each other. The Indo-Pak composite talks were stalled following the November 2008 Mumbai terror attacks. Even though the foreign secretaries of both the countries met on February 25, 2009 in New Delhi, the deliberations failed to yield any substantial result with India pressing hard on its undue demand for Islamabad to do more against terror networks.

The key to political stability in South Asia is to deal with the terrorism and internal conflicts. Regional cross-border cooperation is an essential part of any counterinsurgency strategy. Considerable potential exists for regional cooperation in reducing conflict, but this has been an underutilized strategy in combating terrorism in South Asia.

While all countries want to take this opportunity to iron out their regional differences, regional politics will overshadow common concerns like poverty alleviation, promoting economic cooperation and climate change.

Nihal Rodrigo, former Secretary General of SAARC, once said that in 1999-soon after the Indo-Pak nuclear explosions when the SAARC process came to a standstill-there took place around 360 meetings of various SAARC and South Asian related associations and forums. This clearly shows the desire among professionals to interact with one another and to be in close touch across borders.

But the achievements on other areas such as economic integration, is far from satisfactory. South Asia remains the least integrated region in the world despite South Asia Preferential Trading Arrangement (SAPTA) and South Asia Free Trade Agreement (SAFTA).

On the whole, SAARC has a long way to go for people of the region to appreciate the benefits of regional integration like visa free travel as in the EU. However, SAARC could not become a solid organization.

The neighbours always feared India’s domination as it accounted for 80 percent of land area, population and GDP of the region. The regional politics overwhelms to dilute economic issues in the SAARC agenda. The key political impediment is the Indo-Pakistan conflict. Since they are the largest members of SAARC, their problems have ramifications on the SAARC work program.

Owing to the largest size of its economy, India is trying to dominate and damage the indigenous industries of the other SAARC countries, the progress of various programs like SAFTA gets slowed down. It is because of the Indian secret strategic designs that the SAARC countries prefer to do business in EU or USA instead of India.

It is misfortune of South Asia that India has been endangering the regional peace by dreaming to become a superpower in wake of modern world trends like renunciation of war, peaceful settlement of disputes and economic integration. Over the years, India has not only been developing its conventional and nuclear arsenals, but is also obtaining latest weapons from the US, Russia and Israel. As to how India has blocked the progress of the SAARC in one or the other way could be judged from the fact that in May 1998, it detonated five nuclear explosions and compelled Pakistan to follow the suit. Thus New Delhi entangled Pakistan in a deadly arms race, which dependents upon the minimum nuclear deterrence.

As regards Indian belligerent approach, it has always tried to intimidate other neighbouring countries, especially Pakistan whom the former considers a continuous obstacle in the way of its designs. Under the pretext of Talibinisation, Indian secret agency, RAW has well-established its tentacles in Afghanistan, and has been running secret operations against Pakistan from its consulates located near the Pak-Afghan border.

It is due to Indian intransigence and ambition of political and economic hegemony that the overload of ‘soft issues’ in the agenda dominates the SAARC deliberations. Consequently, core issues like Kashmir and water including other ones such as trade and investment integration, get undermined during the deliberations.

Although the environment and the economy will feature prominently as it is the theme of the Summit�in addition, they may sign the agreement on South Asia Trade in Services (SATIS), yet the thorny dispute of Kashmir must not only be included in the agenda of this summit but also in every forthcoming summit.

India which considers the occupied Kashmir as integral part of the Indian union is using delaying tactics in order to avoid the solution of this old issue. Notably, India wants to keep her control on Kashmir which is located in the Indus River basin area which contributes to the flow of all the major rivers, entering Pakistan. By constructing dams in order to stop the flow of water, New Delhi is determined to bring about political, economic and social problems of grave nature in Pakistan. In this connection, directly or indirectly, New Delhi blocks the progress of the SAARC.

The postponement of the SAARC Summit in 1999 followed renewed tension between India and Pakistan. Similarly, both countries’ preferential imports from each other declined significantly from 1996 to 1998 following the nuclear tests in 1998 and the Kargil conflict in 1999.

Indian ambition to become a superpower of the region by bringing the other regional countries under its control and by behaving like an imperialist power has hampered even the development of SAAR towards economic integration like the EU.

It is due to Indian ‘hegemonistic’ designs that the slow progress of the SAPTA has seen a shift in focus towards bilateral trading agreements instead of multilateral ones between SAARC member countries.

Nevertheless, for economic and political reasons, SAARC has made relatively slow progress on expanding intraregional trade. In this context, political will and a change of mindset is crucial to resolve economic obstacles like the Kashmir dispute, if the SAARC region does not wish to fall further behind economically.

This is because of Indian obduracy in connection with Kashmir and its desire to become a superpower that it would be difficult for Islamabad and New Delhi to have even a separate bilateral Free Trade Arrangements (FTA)�particularly because of political tension initiated by India in the aftermath of Mumbai carnage last year, which provided India a pretext to further deteriorate its ties with Pakistan. In this regard, New Delhi left no stone unturned to isolate Islamabad diplomatically through a series of false allegations, while non-state actors were responsible for that tragedy, and there was no official involvement of Pakistan.

If India abandons its intransigence to dominate the other neighbouring countries and pays attention to the settlement of Kahsmir dispute, a regional trade arrangement such as the SAFTA administered under the SAARC would enable the member countries to obtain production inputs from each other at lower costs. The savings on logistics due to shorter distances and storage times would result in huge savings for South Asian manufacturers and consumers. For example, for Pakistan steel producers it would be more economical to import iron ore from India instead of Australia, Brazil or Canada. India on the other hand could procure scrap iron from Pakistan instead of Korea at higher costs.